<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DivShare Groups: The web&#8217;s most powerful way to share</title>
	<link>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/</link>
	<description>The latest updates from DivShare, the leader in professional document and media sharing.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: darshi</title>
		<link>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-12885</link>
		<dc:creator>darshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-12885</guid>
		<description>i like to join divshare group</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like to join divshare group</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chadsads</title>
		<link>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-8847</link>
		<dc:creator>chadsads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-8847</guid>
		<description>I want to know who won that divshare button contest, mine has over 4000 downloads. Even if mine doesn't win I still want to know who won the contest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to know who won that divshare button contest, mine has over 4000 downloads. Even if mine doesn&#8217;t win I still want to know who won the contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naveen</title>
		<link>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-3780</link>
		<dc:creator>Naveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 07:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-3780</guid>
		<description>I just played with divshare for sometime and Im really thrilled. Please send me ur support email id so that i can constantly keep in touch with u guys.

Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just played with divshare for sometime and Im really thrilled. Please send me ur support email id so that i can constantly keep in touch with u guys.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NAW-T-BOY</title>
		<link>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-3597</link>
		<dc:creator>NAW-T-BOY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-3597</guid>
		<description>I am trying to set up a group but I do not want to make my files public.  I have added a group member but when they sign in they can see my folders but if they click on them it says this file is private.

The user I have set up is a moderator....and I have set up all the other iptions correctly as far as who can see the group.

Any ideas why these are still showing up private even though the group user is signed in under there user name that is affiliated with the group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to set up a group but I do not want to make my files public.  I have added a group member but when they sign in they can see my folders but if they click on them it says this file is private.</p>
<p>The user I have set up is a moderator&#8230;.and I have set up all the other iptions correctly as far as who can see the group.</p>
<p>Any ideas why these are still showing up private even though the group user is signed in under there user name that is affiliated with the group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eve</title>
		<link>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-3451</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-3451</guid>
		<description>In case you don't want to make big changes to the Images download page I would postulate to change the "preview" image created for images size to be 800x600 rather than 750x562. I believe this will save you some of storage space.Im sure there are much more 800x600 images uploaded already than the custom resolution u show, or that it's more probably that people will resize to 800x600 before upload if they don't want to bother viewers to specially click the link to "real" picture. Anyway i believe you are good enough to figure out the filesize or resolution checking solution. I would also be content to see the option to disable the ability (and thus the generation) of video preview flash. For the files i uploaded the image quality was too bad or contained much errors to view anyway.

Great job witht the GUI uploader. So far i only see that it do not create preview thumbnails for videos for me(those are visible normally in explorer), as well as dont create .DDS(DXT texture) and .TGA graphics files available to explorer through custom extension libraries.

I would be very happy to see context-menu rename or rename in the lower pane for target file(between local filesystem and the divshare name).

So far thanks for great service.
Keep up the good work.

Eve aka Wizard of OZ®</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you don&#8217;t want to make big changes to the Images download page I would postulate to change the &#8220;preview&#8221; image created for images size to be 800&#215;600 rather than 750&#215;562. I believe this will save you some of storage space.Im sure there are much more 800&#215;600 images uploaded already than the custom resolution u show, or that it&#8217;s more probably that people will resize to 800&#215;600 before upload if they don&#8217;t want to bother viewers to specially click the link to &#8220;real&#8221; picture. Anyway i believe you are good enough to figure out the filesize or resolution checking solution. I would also be content to see the option to disable the ability (and thus the generation) of video preview flash. For the files i uploaded the image quality was too bad or contained much errors to view anyway.</p>
<p>Great job witht the GUI uploader. So far i only see that it do not create preview thumbnails for videos for me(those are visible normally in explorer), as well as dont create .DDS(DXT texture) and .TGA graphics files available to explorer through custom extension libraries.</p>
<p>I would be very happy to see context-menu rename or rename in the lower pane for target file(between local filesystem and the divshare name).</p>
<p>So far thanks for great service.<br />
Keep up the good work.</p>
<p>Eve aka Wizard of OZ®</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evilbunny</title>
		<link>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-3348</link>
		<dc:creator>Evilbunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-3348</guid>
		<description>Great job divshare! I love your service and the groups is a good idea. May I suggest folders for groups? I'm fairly new to this feature so maybe I'm missing it but it would be great if the moderators can move files to folders/subfolders to organize files in the group.

Again, thanks for the service!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job divshare! I love your service and the groups is a good idea. May I suggest folders for groups? I&#8217;m fairly new to this feature so maybe I&#8217;m missing it but it would be great if the moderators can move files to folders/subfolders to organize files in the group.</p>
<p>Again, thanks for the service!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library clips :: Roundup : MyQuire, Wattpad, Grouptivity Discuss, DivShare Groups, Netvibes Universe :: April :: 2007</title>
		<link>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-3159</link>
		<dc:creator>Library clips :: Roundup : MyQuire, Wattpad, Grouptivity Discuss, DivShare Groups, Netvibes Universe :: April :: 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-3159</guid>
		<description>[...] DivShare Groups - file hosts are moving fast, Box has sharing of files, networks (handy if you are always sharing with the same people), a public box and widget. Features like the public box and now DivShare groups are taking filing sharing to the public, but because it&#8217;s based on a social network it&#8217;s upto the user to not share copyrighted files&#8230;you can always create a private group. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] DivShare Groups - file hosts are moving fast, Box has sharing of files, networks (handy if you are always sharing with the same people), a public box and widget. Features like the public box and now DivShare groups are taking filing sharing to the public, but because it&#8217;s based on a social network it&#8217;s upto the user to not share copyrighted files&#8230;you can always create a private group. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raniie</title>
		<link>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-2735</link>
		<dc:creator>Raniie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-2735</guid>
		<description>Great to hear that, &lt;b&gt;Rob&lt;/b&gt;!

I believe an obvious, practical, and quick solution to that option would be an implementation of the "Direct Link" onto the preview image (Of course, you'll probably fancy it up your own way. ^_~). Then, you can still have the fixed resized image being displayed (for the faster previewing), but upon clicking on the image, it will load the original full size image for display.

Tho, I gotta say, it's really nice that you guys kept the quality still preserved in it's resized preview form. In most other image hosting sites I've seen and used before, the resizing optimizations used for preview images is really crappy. It's good to see you guys care about the quality of the image shown for your DivShare users.

Keep up the great service and quality of DivShare, you guys rock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to hear that, <b>Rob</b>!</p>
<p>I believe an obvious, practical, and quick solution to that option would be an implementation of the &#8220;Direct Link&#8221; onto the preview image (Of course, you&#8217;ll probably fancy it up your own way. ^_~). Then, you can still have the fixed resized image being displayed (for the faster previewing), but upon clicking on the image, it will load the original full size image for display.</p>
<p>Tho, I gotta say, it&#8217;s really nice that you guys kept the quality still preserved in it&#8217;s resized preview form. In most other image hosting sites I&#8217;ve seen and used before, the resizing optimizations used for preview images is really crappy. It&#8217;s good to see you guys care about the quality of the image shown for your DivShare users.</p>
<p>Keep up the great service and quality of DivShare, you guys rock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-2730</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-2730</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hey Raniie&lt;/strong&gt;,

You're right, we used to do it that way but switched to a fixed "display image" size. The reason for this was that, although the big images look good for those of us with big monitors and fast connections, we found that a lot of users who were upping their digital camera photos (1 meg+) were subjected to a long wait and a partially-loaded, gigantic image. The Javascript resize didn't kick in until after that whole image loaded, which could be 10 - 30 seconds, and during that time it seemed like the page was messed up. We're not really planning on going back to the old way any time soon, but now that you mention it, we'll work on building some better "view the large image without downloading" options into the new download page. Rock on,

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hey Raniie</strong>,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, we used to do it that way but switched to a fixed &#8220;display image&#8221; size. The reason for this was that, although the big images look good for those of us with big monitors and fast connections, we found that a lot of users who were upping their digital camera photos (1 meg+) were subjected to a long wait and a partially-loaded, gigantic image. The Javascript resize didn&#8217;t kick in until after that whole image loaded, which could be 10 - 30 seconds, and during that time it seemed like the page was messed up. We&#8217;re not really planning on going back to the old way any time soon, but now that you mention it, we&#8217;ll work on building some better &#8220;view the large image without downloading&#8221; options into the new download page. Rock on,</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raniie</title>
		<link>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-2729</link>
		<dc:creator>Raniie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.divshare.com/2007/04/10/divshare-groups-the-most-powerful-way-to-share/#comment-2729</guid>
		<description>From the support FAQ page:

"Can I upload more than five files, or an entire folder, at one time?

Currently, users can upload up to five individual files at a time. In the near future, &lt;b&gt;we'll be introducing alternative uploading methods (such as Java and FTP) in a premium plan to allow users to upload both larger file sizes and entire folders.&lt;/b&gt;"

Anywho, I have a concern about the image display page. Is there any plans on changing the way images are displayed in the gallery page? Cause it's very annoying having the image resize down to 750x421-res and in order to see the larger image, you must download it.

Wouldn't it be more efficient to just load the full image, then set it to automatically resize to fit the window and if the user want to see it in original resolution, a simple click will restore it? Instead of using more bandwidth to load a preview image and then to also download the original image. 

You guys had it like that a few previous updates ago or was this a glitch? Either way, it's a good glitch! Example: &lt;a href="http://www.divshare.com/download/113104-d6a" rel="nofollow"&gt;href="http://www.divshare.com/download/113104-d6a&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the support FAQ page:</p>
<p>&#8220;Can I upload more than five files, or an entire folder, at one time?</p>
<p>Currently, users can upload up to five individual files at a time. In the near future, <b>we&#8217;ll be introducing alternative uploading methods (such as Java and FTP) in a premium plan to allow users to upload both larger file sizes and entire folders.</b>&#8221;</p>
<p>Anywho, I have a concern about the image display page. Is there any plans on changing the way images are displayed in the gallery page? Cause it&#8217;s very annoying having the image resize down to 750&#215;421-res and in order to see the larger image, you must download it.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be more efficient to just load the full image, then set it to automatically resize to fit the window and if the user want to see it in original resolution, a simple click will restore it? Instead of using more bandwidth to load a preview image and then to also download the original image. </p>
<p>You guys had it like that a few previous updates ago or was this a glitch? Either way, it&#8217;s a good glitch! Example: <a href="http://www.divshare.com/download/113104-d6a" rel="nofollow">href=&#8221;http://www.divshare.com/download/113104-d6a</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
